History
  • No items yet
midpage
Felix Mendelson v. County of San Mateo
20-17389
| 9th Cir. | Oct 27, 2021
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before: BADE and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges, and SESSIONS, [**] District Judge.

After the district court’s consideration of this matter, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Pakdel v. City & County of San Francisco , 141 S. Ct. 2226 (2021). We vacate the district court’s order of dismissal and remand this case to *2 the district court for reevaluation in light of Pakdel . We DENY Appellant’s motions to take judicial notice (Dkt. Nos. 12, 43) and GRANT Pacific Legal Foundation’s motion to become amicus curiae (Dkt. No. 17). Each party to bear its own costs.

VACATED and REMANDED.

2

[*] This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

[**] The Honorable William K. Sessions III, United States District Judge for the District of Vermont, sitting by designation.

Case Details

Case Name: Felix Mendelson v. County of San Mateo
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Date Published: Oct 27, 2021
Docket Number: 20-17389
Court Abbreviation: 9th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.