History
  • No items yet
midpage
Davis v. Martin
15 Tex. Civ. App. 62
| Tex. App. | 1896
|
Check Treatment
KEY, Associate Justice.

Opinion.—The judgment appealed from does not dispose of S. H. Henderson and Smith Coffey, both of whom are parties to the suit, and hence there is no final judgment, and this court has no jurisdiction to entertain the appeal. Martin v. Crow, 28 Texas, 614; Simpson v. Bennett, 42 Texas, 241; Linn v. Arambould, 55 Texas, 611, Mignon v. Brinson, 74 Texas, 18; Mills v. Paul, 1 Texas Civ. App., 415; 23 S. W. Rep., 394.

Appeal dismissed.

Case Details

Case Name: Davis v. Martin
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Dec 9, 1896
Citation: 15 Tex. Civ. App. 62
Court Abbreviation: Tex. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.