Case Information
*1 In the United States Court of Federal Claims
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 20-2061V
UNPUBLISHED FRANCISCO MARCILLO, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, Filed: September 3, 2021 v.
Special Processing Unit (SPU); SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Ruling on Entitlement; Concession; HUMAN SERVICES, Table Injury; Tetanus Diphtheria
acellular Pertussis (Tdap) Vaccine; Respondent. Vasovagal Syncope Alison H. Haskins, Maglio Christopher & Toale, PA, Sarasota, FL, for Petitioner. Laurie Wiesner, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
RULING ON ENTITLEMENT
[1] On December 30, 2020, Francisco Marcillo filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq. [2] (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered from a syncopal episode after receiving a tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis (“Tdap”) vaccine on March 13, 2020, which resulted in injury. Petition at 2. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.
On September 2, 2021, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, Respondent states that “petitioner has satisfied the criteria set forth in the recently revised Vaccine Injury Table (“Table”) and the Qualifications and Aids to *2 Interpretation (“QAI”), which afford petitioner a presumption of causation if the onset of vasovagal syncope occurs within one hour after a Tdap vaccination and there is no apparent alternative cause”. Id. at 7. Respondent further agrees that “petitioner experienced more than six months of residual effects.” Id.
In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that Petitioner is entitled to compensation.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Brian H. Corcoran
Brian H. Corcoran
Chief Special Master
2
[1] Because this unpublished Ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.
[2] National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012).