History
  • No items yet
midpage
McKinney v. State
2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 141
| Mo. Ct. App. | 2014
|
Check Treatment

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Brandon McKinney appeals from the motion court’s Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Judgment denying his Rule 29.15 Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Judgment and Sentence and Request for Evidentiary Hearing, alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. *291An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case Details

Case Name: McKinney v. State
Court Name: Missouri Court of Appeals
Date Published: Feb 11, 2014
Citation: 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 141
Docket Number: No. ED 99799
Court Abbreviation: Mo. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.