History
  • No items yet
midpage
Thomas v. State
2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 315
| Mo. Ct. App. | 2004
|
Check Treatment

*427 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Johnnie Thomas, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the motion court’s judgment is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case Details

Case Name: Thomas v. State
Court Name: Missouri Court of Appeals
Date Published: Mar 9, 2004
Citation: 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 315
Docket Number: No. ED 82928
Court Abbreviation: Mo. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.