History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Bridges
2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 861
| Mo. Ct. App. | 2003
|
Check Treatment

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant Casheme Bridges appeals the judgment entered upon his conviction for trafficking drugs in the second degree, in violation of section 195.223 RSMo 2000. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. A detailed opinion would be of no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties with a brief memorandum opinion, for their information only, explaining the reasons for our decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Bridges
Court Name: Missouri Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jun 10, 2003
Citation: 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 861
Docket Number: No. ED 81233
Court Abbreviation: Mo. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.