History
  • No items yet
midpage
Cross v. State
2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 853
| Mo. Ct. App. | 2003
|
Check Treatment

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Gary Cross appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing.

Cross was convicted of two counts of forcible sodomy. This Court affirmed the conviction. Cross v. State, 58 S.W.3d 896 (Mo.App. E.D.2001). Cross filed a motion under Rule 29.15 alleging that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to fully cross-examine the victim and for declining the substitution of an alternate juror for a sleeping juror. The motion court denied the motion without an evidentiary hearing.

The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).

Case Details

Case Name: Cross v. State
Court Name: Missouri Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jun 10, 2003
Citation: 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 853
Docket Number: No. ED 81586
Court Abbreviation: Mo. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.