History
  • No items yet
midpage
Holman v. State
101 S.W.3d 343
| Mo. Ct. App. | 2003
|
Check Treatment

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Robert Holman (Movant) appeals from the judgment denying his motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 24.0351 without a hearing. Movant contends the motion court erred in denying his claim that his plea counsel induced his guilty plea by erroneously advising him that the three stealing offenses to which he pled guilty were misdemeanors.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have provided the parties with a memorandum for their use only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2002, unless otherwise indicated.

Case Details

Case Name: Holman v. State
Court Name: Missouri Court of Appeals
Date Published: Apr 1, 2003
Citation: 101 S.W.3d 343
Docket Number: No. ED 81591
Court Abbreviation: Mo. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.