History
  • No items yet
midpage
Jones v. Kirchner Block & Brick, Inc.
81 S.W.3d 163
| Mo. Ct. App. | 2002
|
Check Treatment

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

William G. Jones and Shelbia Jones (hereinafter, “Appellants”) appeal from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment entered in favor of Kirchner Block & Brick, Inc. (hereinafter, “Kirchner”). Appellants claim that Kirchner owed him a duty of care which would have prevented him from coming into contact with electrical lines when raising the bed of his dump truck.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. There is no genuine issue of material fact which would preclude entry of summary judgment. Rule 74.04(c)(3); ITT Commercial Finance v. Mid-America Marine, 854 S.W.2d 371, 376 (Mo. banc 1993). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case Details

Case Name: Jones v. Kirchner Block & Brick, Inc.
Court Name: Missouri Court of Appeals
Date Published: Apr 30, 2002
Citation: 81 S.W.3d 163
Docket Number: No. ED 80128
Court Abbreviation: Mo. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.