History
  • No items yet
midpage
Martin v. State
2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 372
| Mo. Ct. App. | 2002
|
Check Treatment

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Samuel Martin (Movant) appeals from a judgment denying his request for post-conviction relief under Rule 29.151 without an evidentiary hearing. Movant claims ineffective assistance of trial counsel. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court’s judgment is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2001, unless otherwise indicated.

Case Details

Case Name: Martin v. State
Court Name: Missouri Court of Appeals
Date Published: Feb 26, 2002
Citation: 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 372
Docket Number: No. ED 79558
Court Abbreviation: Mo. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.