History
  • No items yet
midpage
Norton v. State
66 S.W.3d 27
| Mo. Ct. App. | 2001
|
Check Treatment

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Terry Norton (Appellant) appeals from the trial court’s Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law denying his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 24.035 without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the trial court are not clearly erroneous. Moss v. State, 10 S.W.3d 508, 511 (Mo.banc 2000). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Case Details

Case Name: Norton v. State
Court Name: Missouri Court of Appeals
Date Published: Oct 23, 2001
Citation: 66 S.W.3d 27
Docket Number: No. ED 79003
Court Abbreviation: Mo. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.