ORDER

George W. Newman appeals the denial of his 29.15 motion for postconviction relief.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and find no *916error of law. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the applicable principles of law would have no prec-edential or jurisprudential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).