History
  • No items yet
midpage
Treat v. Treat
2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 1009
| Mo. Ct. App. | 2001
|
Check Treatment

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

David W. Treat appeals from a trial court judgment denying his Motion to Modify/Terminate Maintenance. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, nor does it erroneously declare or apply the law. Hartzell v. Hartzell, 976 S.W.2d 624, 626 (Mo.App. E.D.1998). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Case Details

Case Name: Treat v. Treat
Court Name: Missouri Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jun 12, 2001
Citation: 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 1009
Docket Number: No. ED 77627
Court Abbreviation: Mo. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.