History
  • No items yet
midpage
Pinner v. State
31 S.W.3d 123
| Mo. Ct. App. | 2000
|
Check Treatment

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Derelle Pinner (“Movant”) appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion to vacate, set aside or correct his judgment and sentence without an eviden-tiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would be of no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case Details

Case Name: Pinner v. State
Court Name: Missouri Court of Appeals
Date Published: Sep 12, 2000
Citation: 31 S.W.3d 123
Docket Number: No. ED 77099
Court Abbreviation: Mo. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.