History
  • No items yet
midpage
In the Interest of A.Y.W.
2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 1341
| Mo. Ct. App. | 2000
|
Check Treatment

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Amanda Bow appeals the trial court’s termination of her parental rights with respect to her one minor son, A.Y.W, pursuant to Section 211.447.4(6) RSMo (Cum Supp.1998). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the transcripts and find the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976).

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Case Details

Case Name: In the Interest of A.Y.W.
Court Name: Missouri Court of Appeals
Date Published: Sep 12, 2000
Citation: 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 1341
Docket Number: No. ED 76975
Court Abbreviation: Mo. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.