History
  • No items yet
midpage
Strauss v. State
998 S.W.2d 43
| Mo. Ct. App. | 1999
|
Check Treatment

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant Timothy Strauss was convicted of one count of felony stealing, Section 570.030, RSMo 1994, and filed a motion to vacate judgment and sentence under Rule 29.15. Movant now appeals from the judgment denying his motion without an evi-dentiary hearing.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). No precedential or jurisprudential purpose would be served by an extended opinion reciting detailed facts and restating principles of law. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case Details

Case Name: Strauss v. State
Court Name: Missouri Court of Appeals
Date Published: May 18, 1999
Citation: 998 S.W.2d 43
Docket Number: No. 73498
Court Abbreviation: Mo. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.