History
  • No items yet
midpage
Cotton v. State
991 S.W.2d 209
| Mo. Ct. App. | 1999
|
Check Treatment

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant Gregory Cotton filed this appeal challenging the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without a hearing. On appeal, Movant contends he is entitled to a hearing on his claim that his plea counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate and prepare a defense for him.

Movant fails to file a copy of the transcript from the guilty plea hearing. On appeal, Movant bears the burden of showing the motion court’s findings are clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). Furthermore, Movant bears the burden of providing a transcript under Rule 81.12 containing all the record necessary to determine the questions on appeal. Movant’s failure to file the guilty plea transcript means his contentions on appeal are unsupported, and we are unable to determine whether the motion court’s actions are clearly erroneous. Speakman v. State, 602 S.W.2d 471, 472-73 (Mo.App. E.D.1980). Under the circumstances, we affirm the motion court’s judgment.

Case Details

Case Name: Cotton v. State
Court Name: Missouri Court of Appeals
Date Published: May 18, 1999
Citation: 991 S.W.2d 209
Docket Number: No. 74235
Court Abbreviation: Mo. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.