History
  • No items yet
midpage
Ford v. State
1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1767
| Mo. Ct. App. | 1994
|
Check Treatment

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the denial, without an evi-dentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case Details

Case Name: Ford v. State
Court Name: Missouri Court of Appeals
Date Published: Nov 15, 1994
Citation: 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1767
Docket Number: No. 65517
Court Abbreviation: Mo. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.