History
  • No items yet
midpage
Bates v. State
1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1586
| Mo. Ct. App. | 1992
|
Check Treatment

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the denial without an evidentiary hearing of his Rule 24.035 motion. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case Details

Case Name: Bates v. State
Court Name: Missouri Court of Appeals
Date Published: Oct 13, 1992
Citation: 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1586
Docket Number: No. 61723
Court Abbreviation: Mo. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.