History
  • No items yet
midpage
Gubernik v. Steinberg
842 S.W.2d 587
| Mo. Ct. App. | 1992
|
Check Treatment

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff appeals the trial court’s dismissal of his petition which attempted to allege malpractice by his former attorneys. We affirm. No error of law appears and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case Details

Case Name: Gubernik v. Steinberg
Court Name: Missouri Court of Appeals
Date Published: Dec 29, 1992
Citation: 842 S.W.2d 587
Docket Number: No. 61973
Court Abbreviation: Mo. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.