History
  • No items yet
midpage
Young v. State
841 S.W.2d 776
| Mo. Ct. App. | 1992
|
Check Treatment

*777ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Donald Lee Young, appeals from the denial of his Rule 27.26 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the record as submitted, and conclude that the trial court’s judgment is based upon findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous; no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Case Details

Case Name: Young v. State
Court Name: Missouri Court of Appeals
Date Published: Nov 17, 1992
Citation: 841 S.W.2d 776
Docket Number: No. 61147
Court Abbreviation: Mo. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.