History
  • No items yet
midpage
Nobles v. State
837 S.W.2d 46
| Mo. Ct. App. | 1992
|
Check Treatment

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals following dismissal of his Rule 24.035 motion as untimely filed. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the rea*47sons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case Details

Case Name: Nobles v. State
Court Name: Missouri Court of Appeals
Date Published: Sep 22, 1992
Citation: 837 S.W.2d 46
Docket Number: No. 61476
Court Abbreviation: Mo. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.