History
  • No items yet
midpage
Prince v. State
1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 361
| Mo. Ct. App. | 1990
|
Check Treatment

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the denial after an evi-dentiary hearing of his motion to vacate sentence pursuant to Rule 27.26 (now repealed). We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous and an extended opinion would serve no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case Details

Case Name: Prince v. State
Court Name: Missouri Court of Appeals
Date Published: Mar 6, 1990
Citation: 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 361
Docket Number: No. 56495
Court Abbreviation: Mo. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.