History
  • No items yet
midpage
In re Durham
1976 Mo. App. LEXIS 1916
| Mo. Ct. App. | 1976
|
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s brief fails to comply with Rule 84.04. The statement of facts, consisting of five sentences does not set forth “facts relevant to the questions presented for determination.” The points do not “state briefly and concisely what actions or rulings of the court are sought to be reviewed and wherein and why they are claimed to be erroneous.” Appellant’s “abstract statements of law without showing how they are related to any action or ruling of the court is not a compliance with this rule.”

Appeal dismissed.

All concur.

Case Details

Case Name: In re Durham
Court Name: Missouri Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jan 6, 1976
Citation: 1976 Mo. App. LEXIS 1916
Docket Number: No. 9854
Court Abbreviation: Mo. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.