History
  • No items yet
midpage
In re T.T.C.
868 A.2d 859
| D.C. | 2005
|
Check Treatment

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of appellant’s petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc, the consent motion of appellee, District of Columbia, to late file the lodged opposition to the petition, and the statement of appellee, L.O.C., it is

ORDERED that the motion of appellee, District of Columbia, to late file the opposition is granted and the Clerk is directed to file the lodged opposition to the petition. It is

FURTHER ORDERED by the merits division * that the petition for rehearing is granted to the extent that this court’s opinion filed August 5, 2004, 855 A.2d 1117, is amended by striking, in their entirety, the last two sentences in the first paragraph at the top of page 1121. It is

*860FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for rehearing is otherwise denied; and it appearing that no judge of this court has called for a vote on the petition for rehearing en banc, it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for rehearing en banc is denied.

Case Details

Case Name: In re T.T.C.
Court Name: District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Date Published: Feb 16, 2005
Citation: 868 A.2d 859
Docket Number: Nos. 02-FS-136, 02-FS-152 and 02-FS-153
Court Abbreviation: D.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.