History
  • No items yet
midpage
Lime Rock Bank v. Macomber
29 Me. 564
| Me. | 1849
|
Check Treatment

The ComtT, by

Howard, J.

orally.

Formerly the assent of the bank, in such a case, was required to be proved by record. More recently the consent of its officers has been held sufficient. The jury were justified in finding such consent. A suit in the name of the United States was recently maintained by direction of the Postmaster General, for the benefit of an individual. Exceptions overruled.

Case Details

Case Name: Lime Rock Bank v. Macomber
Court Name: Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Date Published: May 15, 1849
Citation: 29 Me. 564
Court Abbreviation: Me.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.