History
  • No items yet
midpage
David B. Roberts v. State of Florida
21-2053
| Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Sep 22, 2021
|
Check Treatment

*1 F IRST D ISTRICT C OURT OF A PPEAL S TATE OF F LORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D21-2053 _____________________________ D AVID B. R OBERTS ,

Petitioner,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA ,

Respondent.

_____________________________ Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel— Original Jurisdiction.

September 22, 2021 P ER C URIAM .

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits. See Topps v. State , 865 So. 2d 1253, 1258 (Fla. 2004) (explaining that a decision on an extraordinary writ petition that “clearly shows that the issue was considered by the court on the merits” is deemed a decision “which would later bar the litigant from presenting the issue under the doctrines of res judicata or collateral estoppel”).

R AY , J AY , and T ANENBAUM , JJ., concur.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331 .

_____________________________ David B. Roberts, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

2

Case Details

Case Name: David B. Roberts v. State of Florida
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Sep 22, 2021
Docket Number: 21-2053
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.