History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Aradi
26 Fla. Supp. 2d 159
Fla. Cir. Ct.
1988
Check Treatment

OPINION OF THE COURT

SALMON, J.

The State is not responsible to produce state witnesses subpoenaed *160by the defense for discovery purposes. State v. Del Guadio, 445 So.2d 605 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984). The requests for continuance made by Appellee, therefor, made him unavailable for trial within the meaning of the speedy trial rule. He should not have been discharged. Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.191(d)(3).

Reversed and remanded for trial.

HENDERSON and NADLER, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Aradi
Court Name: Circuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida
Date Published: Feb 1, 1988
Citation: 26 Fla. Supp. 2d 159
Docket Number: Case No. 87-054 AC (County Court Case No. 7727Z,3PG)
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Cir. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.