History
  • No items yet
midpage
Baioff v. Miami Shores Village
6 Fla. Supp. 2d 160
| Fla. Cir. Ct. | 1982
|
Check Treatment

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

Although we are of the opinion that appellant’s due process rights were probably violated by the procedures followed by the Miami Shores Village Code Enforcement Board, it is not necessary to decide this case on that point.

The record discloses that appellant cannot be prohibited from using *161her home as a rooming house because of the doctrine of Non-conforming use. See Bemas Corporation v. City of Jacksonville, 298 So.2d 467 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974), Milling v. Berg, 104 So.2d 658 (Fla. 2d DCA 1958), City of Miami v. Lithgow, 12 So.2d 380 (Fla. 1943), and Daoud v. City of Miami Beach, 780 2d 585 (Fla. 1942).

REVERSED.

Case Details

Case Name: Baioff v. Miami Shores Village
Court Name: Circuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida
Date Published: Dec 10, 1982
Citation: 6 Fla. Supp. 2d 160
Docket Number: Case No. 81 -190 AP
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Cir. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.