History
  • No items yet
midpage
Southeast First National Bank v. Bradshaw
6 Fla. Supp. 2d 158
Fla. Cir. Ct.
1982
Check Treatment

OPINION OF THE COURT

KORVICK, Judge.

Appellant seeks review of a final judgment entered in behalf of Appellee denying recovery of a Deficiency balance owing from the appellee, Mary Jane Bradshaw.

Appellant raises the issue: Is a Bank regulated by Florida Statute 516.31, and states that the Appellant, Southeast First National Bank of Miami, is a banking institution, which the Florida legislature specifically intended to exclude from the provisions of Chapter 516.

This Appellate Panel, having reviewed the briefs and having heard *159arguments of counsel, reverses the finding of the trial court, and holds that the appellant, Southeast First National Bank of Miami, is a banking institution and that banking institutions are not governed by the provisions of Chapter 516.

Accordingly, we reverse the finding of the trial court and direct the court to enter a deficiency judgment against the appellee, Mary Jane Bradshaw.

REVERSED

Judges Goldman and Orr concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Southeast First National Bank v. Bradshaw
Court Name: Circuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida
Date Published: Oct 20, 1982
Citation: 6 Fla. Supp. 2d 158
Docket Number: Case No. 81-389-AP
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Cir. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.