History
  • No items yet
midpage
Odlin v. City of Arcadia
82 Fla. 178
Fla.
1921
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been sub-, mitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the order aforesaid, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said order; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said order of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.

Taylor, Whitkield and West, J. J., concur. Browne, C. J., and Ellis, J., dissent.

Case Details

Case Name: Odlin v. City of Arcadia
Court Name: Supreme Court of Florida
Date Published: Aug 9, 1921
Citation: 82 Fla. 178
Court Abbreviation: Fla.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.