History
  • No items yet
midpage
Wimbish v. State
25 Tex. Ct. App. 90
| Tex. App. | 1888
|
Check Treatment
White, Presiding Judge.

This appeal is from a judgment of conviction for the theft of one head of cattle.

1. Without a bill of exceptions is saved tó the overruling of ■an application for continuance, the ruling will not be considered on appeal. 2. Unless the charge of the court is excepted to, errors not fundamental nor calculated to injure the rights of the defendant will not necessitate a reversal of the case on appeal.

There are no bills of exception in this record, and we find no reversible error in the charge of the court; on the contrary, we find it a full and liberal exposition of the law applicable to the facts.

Complaint is made that defendant was not allowed the attachments he was entitled to and demanded for his absent witnesses. This complaint is not borne out by the record before us. We have been unable to find any thing in the record for which the judgment should be reversed, and it is therefore affirmed.

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Wimbish v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Feb 25, 1888
Citation: 25 Tex. Ct. App. 90
Docket Number: No. 2488
Court Abbreviation: Tex. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.