History
  • No items yet
midpage
Nicole McCrea v. Wells Fargo
19-2271
| 4th Cir. | Jul 9, 2021
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before KEENAN, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Nicole Rena McCrea , Appellant Pro Se. Sarah E. Meyer, WOMBLE BOND DICKINSON (US) LLP, Baltimore, Maryland; Alvin Frederick, Lauren Elizabeth Marini, ECCLESTON & WOLF, PC, Hanover, Maryland; Richard Basile, LAW OFFICES OF RICHARD *2 BASILE, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Nicole McCrea appeals the district court’s orders dismissing her civil action in which she claimed that Appellees wrongfully denied her a second loan modification under the Home Affordable Modification Program, and denying her motion for reconsideration. We review de novo a district court’s order dismissing a complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), Lokhova v. Halper , 995 F.3d 134, 141 (4th Cir. 2021), and “review the denial of a motion for reconsideration under the deferential abuse of discretion standard,” Wojcicki v. SCANA/SCE&G , 947 F.3d 240, 246 (4th Cir. 2020). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. We therefore affirm the orders of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case Details

Case Name: Nicole McCrea v. Wells Fargo
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Jul 9, 2021
Docket Number: 19-2271
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.