History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Michael McIntosh
21-6500
| 4th Cir. | Jul 2, 2021
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before HARRIS, RICHARDSON, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Anthony McIntosh, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael Anthony McIntosh appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i) motion for compassionate release. Upon review, we discern no abuse of discretion in the district court’s determination both that McIntosh failed to establish an extraordinary and compelling basis for relief and that the pertinent 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors militated against compassionate release. See United States v. Kibble , 992 F.3d 326, 329-31 (4th Cir. 2021) (providing standard of review and outlining steps for evaluating compassionate release motions). Accordingly, we deny McIntosh’s motion to appoint counsel and affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Michael McIntosh
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Jul 2, 2021
Docket Number: 21-6500
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.