History
  • No items yet
midpage
Sarah May v. Andrew Saul
20-35306
| 9th Cir. | Jun 21, 2021
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before: CHRISTEN and BENNETT, Circuit Judges, and SILVER, [**] District Judge.

The Commissioner’s unopposed motion to vacate the district court’s judgment affirming the Commissioner’s final decision and to remand this case to the district court is granted. Dkt. No. 43. The district court’s judgment is therefore *2 vacated, and we remand to the district court with instructions to remand the case to the agency for further proceedings consistent with Carr v. Saul , 141 S. Ct. 1352 (2021).

VACATED and REMANDED.

2

[*] This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

[**] The Honorable Roslyn O. Silver, United States District Judge for the District of Arizona, sitting by designation.

Case Details

Case Name: Sarah May v. Andrew Saul
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Date Published: Jun 21, 2021
Docket Number: 20-35306
Court Abbreviation: 9th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.