History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Sidney Mitchell
20-7163
| 4th Cir. | Jun 17, 2021
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before KEENAN, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sidney Stephon Mitchell, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Sidney Stephon Mitchell appeals the district court’s order denying his post- judgment motion in his closed criminal case to waive fees for his presentencing report. ∗ On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Mitchell’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, he has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey , 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED ∗ We previously dismissed his direct appeal for failure to prosecute. See United States v. Mitchell , No. 18-4064 (4th Cir. Mar. 9, 2018) (order dismissing appeal).

2

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Sidney Mitchell
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Jun 17, 2021
Docket Number: 20-7163
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.