History
  • No items yet
midpage
Sarah Coursen v. A.H. Robins Company
773 F.2d 1049
| 9th Cir. | 1985
|
Check Treatment

773 F.2d 1049

Sarah COURSEN and Katherine Cook, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
A.H. ROBINS COMPANY, INC., a Virginia corporation,
Defendant-Appellee.
Pamela VAN DUYN, Terri Johnson, Joanna B. Kuhnhenn, Gayle
McCann, Laurie Jo Franz, and Debbie Rohl,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
A.H. ROBINS COMPANY, INC., a Virginia corporation, Defendant-Appellee.

Nos. 84-3853 to 84-3861.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

Oct. 8, 1985.

ORDER

1

Before GOODWIN and SKOPIL, Circuit Judges, and VUKASIN,* District Judge.

2

The original opinion in this matter, which appears at 764 F.2d 1329 (9th Cir.1985), contains a typographical error on page 1342. The sentence immediately following headnote 23 on page 1342 should be changed to read as follows: "While a plaintiff cannot appeal a voluntary dismissal without prejudice, he or she may appeal a dismissal with prejudice."

*

The Honorable John P. Vukasin, Jr., United States District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation

Case Details

Case Name: Sarah Coursen v. A.H. Robins Company
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Date Published: Oct 8, 1985
Citation: 773 F.2d 1049
Docket Number: 84-3853
Court Abbreviation: 9th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.