History
  • No items yet
midpage
Noss Co. v. United States
753 F.2d 1052
| Fed. Cir. | 1985
|
Check Treatment

753 F.2d 1052

6 ITRD 1928, 3 Fed. Cir. (T) 92

NOSS CO., Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES, Appellee.

Appeal No. 84-1255.

United States Court of Appeals,
Federal Circuit.

Jan. 30, 1985.

Mark D. Crames, Sandler & Travis, P.C., Miami, Fla., argued for appellant.

Kenneth N. Wolf, Dept. of Justice, New York City, argued for appellee. With him on the brief were Richard K. Willard, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., David M. Cohen, Washington, D.C., Director and Joseph I. Liebman, Atty. in Charge Intern. Trade Field Office, New York City.

Before BALDWIN, KASHIWA and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

BALDWIN, Circuit Judge.

1

This is an appeal from a judgment of the United States Court of International Trade holding that certain imported centrifugal cleaning machines called Radiclones were properly classified under item 661.95 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States. We affirm.

OPINION

2

The judgment appealed from is affirmed on the basis of the opinion filed by the Court of International Trade. Noss Co. v. United States, 588 F. Supp. 1408 (C.I.T.1984).

3

AFFIRMED.

Case Details

Case Name: Noss Co. v. United States
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Date Published: Jan 30, 1985
Citation: 753 F.2d 1052
Docket Number: 84-1255
Court Abbreviation: Fed. Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.