History
  • No items yet
midpage
Tinika Warren v. City of Greensboro
19-1552
4th Cir.
Sep 26, 2019
Check Treatment
Docket

*1 Before WYNN and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tinika S. Warren, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Tinika S. Warren appeals the district court’s order denying her motion for settlement. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Warren v. City of Greensboro , No. 1:16-cv-01396-TDS-JLW (M.D.N.C. May 10, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: Tinika Warren v. City of Greensboro
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Sep 26, 2019
Docket Number: 19-1552
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.