History
  • No items yet
midpage
Pacemaker Diagnostic Clinic of America, Inc., a Tennessee Corporation, Cross-Appellee v. Instromedix, Inc., an Oregon Corporation, Cross-Appellant
718 F.2d 971
| 9th Cir. | 1983
|
Check Treatment

718 F.2d 971

PACEMAKER DIAGNOSTIC CLINIC OF AMERICA, INC., a Tennessee
Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, Cross-Appellee,
v.
INSTROMEDIX, INC., an Oregon Corporation,
Defendant-Appellee, Cross-Appellant.

Nos. 82-3152, 82-3182.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

Oct. 20, 1983.

J. Pierre Kolisch, Kolisch, Hartwell, Dickinson & Stuart, Portland, Or., for defendant-appellee, cross-appellant.

Sherman O. Parrett, Cushman, Darby & Cushman, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff-appellant, cross-appellee.

Before BROWNING, Chief Judge, CHOY, GOODWIN, WALLACE, SNEED, KENNEDY, ANDERSON, HUG, TANG, SKOPIL, SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, FARRIS, PREGERSON, ALARCON, POOLE, FERGUSON, NELSON, CANBY, BOOCHEVER, NORRIS, and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges.ORDER

1

Upon the vote of a majority of the regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by an en banc panel of the court pursuant to Rule 25 of the Rules of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The previous three-judge panel assignment, 712 F.2d 1305 (9th Cir.1983) is withdrawn.

2

Oral argument in the above case will be held in San Francisco, on Tuesday, November 15, 1983, at 1:30 p.m.

Case Details

Case Name: Pacemaker Diagnostic Clinic of America, Inc., a Tennessee Corporation, Cross-Appellee v. Instromedix, Inc., an Oregon Corporation, Cross-Appellant
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Date Published: Oct 20, 1983
Citation: 718 F.2d 971
Docket Number: 82-3152
Court Abbreviation: 9th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.