*1 Before: TROTT, McKEOWN, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.

We affirm for the reasons provided by the district court in its “Order Re Attorneys’ Fees on Remand,” dated April 19, 2017.

AFFIRMED . ^[*] This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

[**] The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).