History
  • No items yet
midpage
Tennille Plise v. Shelley Krohn
708 F. App'x 449
| 9th Cir. | 2018
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*2 Before: WARDLAW and GOULD, Circuit Judges, and COLLINS, [***] Chief District Judge.

Tennille Plise, the former spouse of Debtor William Plise, appeals the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit's (BAP) affirmance of the bankruptcy court's order sustaining the objection of Shelley Krohn, the Chapter 7 trustee for William Plise's bankruptcy estate.

The BAP did not abuse its discretion by affirming the bankruptcy court's order sustaining Krohn's claim objection on the basis of judicial estoppel. See Hamilton v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. , 270 F.3d 778, 782–83 (9th Cir. 2001). Plise held clearly inconsistent positions during the bankruptcy proceeding. The bankruptcy court accepted her prior position in the settlement agreement that $425,000 of the proceeds from the sale of the Austin property would go to unsecured creditors and release Plise from all remaining claims. Plise subsequently made a priority claim and argued that the $425,000 should go to her because she was an unsecured creditor. This change in position would provide her with an unfair advantage. See id. at 782. The BAP thus appropriately determined * * * The Honorable Raner C. Collins, Chief United States District Judge for the District of Arizona, sitting by designation.

that Plise was judicially estopped from taking the current, inconsistent position that the $425,000 should go to her.

AFFIRMED.

Case Details

Case Name: Tennille Plise v. Shelley Krohn
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Date Published: Jan 5, 2018
Citation: 708 F. App'x 449
Docket Number: 15-60032
Court Abbreviation: 9th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.