History
  • No items yet
midpage
Jaelen Wright v. T.N.C.C.
17-1700
| 4th Cir. | Jan 5, 2018
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jaelen M. Wright, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jaelen M. Wright appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Because Wright cannot save his action by amending his complaint, the district court’s order is final, and we have jurisdiction over Wright’s appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012); Goode v. Cent. Va. Legal Aid Soc’y , 807 F.3d 619, 623 (4th Cir. 2015). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Wright v. Thomas Nelson Cmty. Coll. , No. 4:16-cv-00151-RGD-RJK (E.D. Va. May 16, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: Jaelen Wright v. T.N.C.C.
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Jan 5, 2018
Docket Number: 17-1700
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.