History
  • No items yet
midpage
James Clark v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
707 F. App'x 786
| 4th Cir. | 2018
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James A. Clark and Helen P. Clark, Appellants Pro Se. B. Chad Ewing, WOMBLE BOND DICKINSON (US) LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

James A. and Helen P. Clark appeal the district court’s order dismissing their complaint for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, while we grant leave to amend the informal brief and to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Clark v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A. , No. 5:17-cv-00163-BO (E.D.N.C. July 27, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: James Clark v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Jan 5, 2018
Citation: 707 F. App'x 786
Docket Number: 17-1912
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.