History
  • No items yet
midpage
Commonwealth v. Bricker, D.
177 A.3d 823
| Pa. | 2018
|
Check Treatment

*1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 5 WAL 2016

:

Respondent :

: Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Unpublished Memorandum and v. : Order of the Superior Court at No. 849

: WDA 2015 entered on December 29, : 2015, affirming the Judgment of DAVID BRICKER, : Sentence of the Fayette County Court of

: Common Pleas at No. CP-26-CR- Petitioner : 0000835-2014 entered on May 13, 2015 ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 3rd day of January, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED , LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to the remaining issue. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:

Did the sentencing court impose a harsh, severe, and manifestly unreasonable and excessive sentence in light of the circumstances surrounding the alleged incident?

The judgment of sentence is VACATED , and the matter is REMANDED to the Superior Court for reconsideration in light of Commonwealth v. Muniz , 164 A.3d 1189 (Pa. 2017).

Case Details

Case Name: Commonwealth v. Bricker, D.
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Jan 3, 2018
Citation: 177 A.3d 823
Docket Number: 5 WAL 2016
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.