History
  • No items yet
midpage
Charles Tunstall v. Frank Perry
707 F. App'x 203
| 4th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before WILKINSON and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Alonzo Tunstall, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Charles Alonzo Tunstall appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Tunstall’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Tunstall v. Perry , No. 1:16-cv-01434-LCB-JEP (M.D.N.C. July 25, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: Charles Tunstall v. Frank Perry
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Dec 28, 2017
Citation: 707 F. App'x 203
Docket Number: 17-7023
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.