History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Phillip Murphy
707 F. App'x 199
| 4th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before WILKINSON and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Phillip Jerome Murphy, Appellant Pro Se. V. Kathleen Dougherty, William David Muhr, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia; Kevin Patrick Hudson, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Phillip Jerome Murphy appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to dismiss the indictment and void a criminal judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Murphy , No. 2:15-cr-00103-RAJ-DEM-1 (E.D. Va. July 17, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Phillip Murphy
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Dec 28, 2017
Citation: 707 F. App'x 199
Docket Number: 17-7156
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.