History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Luis Mangual
707 F. App'x 190
| 4th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Wyda, Federal Public Defender, Sapna Mirchandani, Appellate Attorney, OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellant. Stephen M. Schenning, Acting United States Attorney, David I. Salem, Assistant United States Attorney, Ellen E. Cobb, Kristine Dietz Cowherd, Special Assistant United States Attorneys, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Luis Felipe Mangual, Jr. appeals the district court’s order granting in part and denying in part his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order and deny Mangual’s motion to place the appeal in abeyance for a case pending in this court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Luis Mangual
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Dec 27, 2017
Citation: 707 F. App'x 190
Docket Number: 17-6621
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.