History
  • No items yet
midpage
Falcon v. Mango Hill Condo. Assoc. No. 2, Inc.
17-1029
| Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Dec 27, 2017
|
Check Treatment

*1 Before SUAREZ, FERNANDEZ and LINDSEY, JJ.

SUAREZ, J.

Florentino Falcon appeals from a final order dismissing his first amended complaint with prejudice. Because we find that the complaint asserted a viable *2 claim and that dismissal was not appropriate to resolve the issue of whether Falcon’s back patio was a “limited common element” pursuant to the Declaration of Condominium, we reverse and remand for further proceedings. We make no findings as to the nature of the patio or the parties’ rights and responsibilities under the Declaration.

Reversed and remanded.

2

Case Details

Case Name: Falcon v. Mango Hill Condo. Assoc. No. 2, Inc.
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Dec 27, 2017
Docket Number: 17-1029
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.