*1 Before GUTIERREZ, Judge; HUSKEY, Judge;

and LORELLO, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM

Heath Thomas Clyne pleaded guilty to operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol (one felony conviction within fifteen years), Idaho Code §§ 18-8004, 18- 8005(9). The district court imposed a unified sentence of ten years, with one and one-half years determinate. Clyne appeals, contending that the district court abused its discretion by not retaining jurisdiction.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established. See State v. Hernandez , 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-15 (Ct. App. 1991); State

1

v. Lopez , 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 1984); State v. Toohill , 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). That discretion includes the trial court’s decision regarding whether a defendant should be placed on probation and whether to retain jurisdiction. I.C. § 19-2601(3); State v. Reber , 138 Idaho 275, 278, 61 P.3d 632, 635 (Ct. App. 2002). State v. Lee , 117 Idaho 203, 205-06, 786 P.2d 596-97 (Ct. App.1990). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Clyne’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.

2